Show simple item record

dc.contributorEconomy Divisionen_US
dc.contributor.authorUnited Nations Environment Programmeen_US
dc.contributor.otherGlobal Action for Sustainable Consumption and Productionen_US
dc.coverage.spatialGlobalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-25T09:41:22Z
dc.date.available2020-05-25T09:41:22Z
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.otherDTI/1515/PAen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/32513
dc.descriptionFrom the beginning of the use of the concept, sustainable consumption and production (SCP) has been related to both poverty eradication and sustainable development. The purpose of this paper is to explore the type and quality of these linkages, and investigate what evidence exists for them. The first section constructs an outline theoretical framework within which these and related concepts can be considered. It notes the shifting language around these concepts. The conclusion of this section is the suggestion of an indicator framework, drawing on indicators of ecosystem goods and services, SCP indicators, and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), through which the nature and extent of these linkages may be assessed. The following sections proceed through the analysis of a number of case studies in different areas, referring back to the theoretical framework and using the indicator framework where the case studies contain relevant data. The case studies have been chosen to give insights into some of the issues, challenges and opportunities relating to SCP in three of the priority sectors identified through the Marrakech Process, as noted above. In different ways they explore how SCP and the related concept of resource efficiency (RE) can advance development and sustainable livelihoods. The case studies also examine how scenarios for development in different sectors can lead to absolute decoupling; and they discuss how these scenarios may be brought about through new institutions, organisations and technologies. Insofar as is possible from the data given in relation to the case studies, their achievements are evaluated through the various indicators that are presented in the next section: environmental, socio-economic and the MDGs. The paper’s conclusions set out the kinds of policies that will foster and develop these new directions for resource efficiency and sustainable consumption and production.en_US
dc.formatTexten_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.rightsPublicen_US
dc.subjectSUSTAINABLE CONSUMPTIONen_US
dc.subjectPOVERTYen_US
dc.subjectECONOMIC GROWTHen_US
dc.subjectTHAILANDen_US
dc.subjectHOUSINGen_US
dc.subjectTRANSPORTen_US
dc.subjectWATERen_US
dc.subjectTOURISMen_US
dc.subjectWASTESen_US
dc.subjectCHINAen_US
dc.subjectSOUTH AFRICAen_US
dc.subjectMANUFACTURINGen_US
dc.subjectFOODen_US
dc.subjectAGRICULTUREen_US
dc.subjectSPAINen_US
dc.subjectPOVERTY MITIGATIONen_US
dc.subjectCLEANER PRODUCTIONen_US
dc.subjectBIOGASen_US
dc.subjectECOSYSTEMSen_US
dc.subjectENERGY EFFICIENCYen_US
dc.titleSustainable Consumption and Production for Poverty Eradicationen_US
dc.typeReports and Booksen_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 1 - No Povertyen_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 2 - No Hungeren_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energyen_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Productionen_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 14 - Life Below Wateren_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 15 - Life on Landen_US
wd.tagsAgricultureen_US
wd.tags Energy Efficiencyen_US
wd.tagsIndustryen_US
wd.tagsLanden_US
wd.topicsChemicals & wasteen_US
wd.topicsEcosystemsen_US
wd.topicsEnergyen_US
wd.topicsEnvironmental governanceen_US
wd.topicsResource efficiencyen_US
wd.topicsTransporten_US
wd.identifier.pagesnumber72 p.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record