Technical Information Report on Mercury Monitoring in Biota
dc.contributor | Economy Division | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | United Nations Environment Programme | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Evers, David | en_US |
dc.contributor.other | Sunderland, Elsie | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-11-20T09:09:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-11-20T09:09:58Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/30821 | |
dc.description | Biota are important bioindicators because they reflect the potential harm of emissions and releases of mercury to air, water and land. Because there are not suitable models to predict the methylation process and the entry of methylmercury into the food web, high trophic level biota is recommended (i.e., trophic level 4 or higher). High trophic level biota can therefore be used to identify spatial gradients, including ecosystem sensitivity spots, and to track changes over time. The technical report compiled and synthesized information available through the “Global Biotic Mercury Synthesis” or GBMS, this database on mercury in biota and identified information and data gaps, comparability, options for filling gaps, available modelling capabilities to assess changes, baselines, and proposed monitoring approaches with an estimated budget. | en_US |
dc.format | Text | en_US |
dc.language | English | en_US |
dc.rights | Public | en_US |
dc.subject | BIOTA | en_US |
dc.subject | MERCURY | en_US |
dc.title | Technical Information Report on Mercury Monitoring in Biota | en_US |
dc.type | Reports and Books | en_US |
wd.identifier.sdg | SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being | en_US |
wd.tags | Mercury | en_US |
wd.topics | Chemicals & waste | en_US |
wd.identifier.pagesnumber | 48 p. | en_US |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
-
Publications and Documents
(Official collection of documents displayed in the UN Environment Publications page)