Show simple item record

dc.contributorEcosystems Divisionen_US
dc.contributor.authorUnited Nations Environment Programmeen_US
dc.contributor.authorGRID-Arendalen_US
dc.contributor.otherJohnsen, K. I.en_US
dc.contributor.otherNiamir-Fuller, M.en_US
dc.contributor.otherBensada, A.en_US
dc.contributor.otherWaters-Bayer, A.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialGlobalen_US
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-27T07:41:38Z
dc.date.available2019-02-27T07:41:38Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-7701-181-3en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11822/27529
dc.descriptionThis report directly responds to one of the resolutions approved at the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) in May 2016, which acknowledges the dearth of information on pastoralism and rangelands. The resolution calls for a gap analysis of environmental and socioeconomic information and the provision of technical support for promoting pastoralism and rangelands. This report is also guided by the mandate of UN Environment to conduct integrated assessments and analyses, the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and specifically the SDGs and their targets and indicators related to pastoralism and rangelands. The gap analysis is based on a rapid study conducted from May 2017 to August 2018, covering information available since 2000. It analyses the accessibility and availability of and level of confidence2 in data on pastoralism and rangelands publicly available from various Internet sources, including assessments, databases, scientific publications in Scopus (an online database of peer-reviewed literature) and multilateral environmental agreements. The gap analysis also examines types of technical support for pastoralism provided by multilateral organizations and through official development assistance (ODA) of member countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). In addition to the rapid study, a survey on the perspectives of different organizations and pastoralists was used to inform the gap analysis, covering issues such as information collection methods, confidence in the data, perceptions of gaps in information, and technical support for pastoralism and rangeland management.en_US
dc.formatTexten_US
dc.languageEnglishen_US
dc.rightsPublicen_US
dc.subjectANIMALSen_US
dc.subjectDRAUGHT ANIMALSen_US
dc.subjectLIVESTOCKen_US
dc.subjectANTHROPOLOGYen_US
dc.subjectANTHROPOLOGISTSen_US
dc.subjectANIMAL ECOLOGYen_US
dc.subjectECOLOGICAL RESEARCHen_US
dc.subjectPASTORALISMen_US
dc.subjectRANGELANDSen_US
dc.titleA Case of Benign Neglect: Knowledge Gaps about Sustainability in Pastoralism and Rangelandsen_US
dc.typeReports and Booksen_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 13 - Climate Actionen_US
wd.identifier.sdgSDG 15 - Life on Landen_US
wd.tagsLanden_US
wd.topicsEcosystemsen_US
wd.identifier.pagesnumber78 p.en_US
wd.identifier.sdgiohttp://purl.unep.org/sdg/SDGIO_00000047
wd.identifier.sdgiohttp://purl.unep.org/sdg/SDGIO_00000049


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record